And nothing more.
Everyone from interim Liberal leader Bill Graham to CUPE Ontario president Sid Ryan to Canada’s daycare lobby now insists they are ready to bring down PM Stephen Harper’s government in order to save Canada’s national daycare program.We think they should be careful what they wish for.
I agree with the Toronto Sun on this one.

Comments (22)
It’s not a bluff, but they have the luxury of talking tough because they know the Bloc will prop up the Conservatives for the time being.
It’s a shame really, because a snap election on this issue could push the CPC into near majority territory. But I guess that’s why the Bloc won’t be voting them out any time soon, isn’t it?
Posted by Occam's Carbuncle | March 13, 2006 10:01 AM
Posted on March 13, 2006 10:01
Jean Charest is hinting at an election. Whenever Charest goes we can expect a Federal election soon after.
Just think of the polls ;) Quebec, then Ontario, the National - or whatever order you want but the next 12-18 months is going to feature a lot of election talk.
Posted by Greg Staples | March 13, 2006 10:10 AM
Posted on March 13, 2006 10:10
I love elections. They’re way more fun than politics.
Posted by Occam's Carbuncle | March 13, 2006 10:12 AM
Posted on March 13, 2006 10:12
Actually OC, Duceppe said the other day that if Harper backs out of the daycare deal with Quebec, it shows he is not serious about the fiscal imbalance and therefore is not to count on BQ support. I would like a nice summer election. It is much nicer to go to the polls when the birds are singing.
Posted by Greg | March 13, 2006 10:47 AM
Posted on March 13, 2006 10:47
You rubes just don’t get it. A lot of people fought a long time to get a national daycare program and now that they have one they aren’t about to let a seat warmer PM cut and run from it. And it will only be a matter of time before the Bloc votes against Harper on something important.
Posted by Robert McClelland | March 13, 2006 11:22 AM
Posted on March 13, 2006 11:22
“A lot of people fought a long time to get a national daycare program and now that they have one they aren’t about to let a seat warmer PM cut and run from it.”
Duh. What makes you reach the conclusion that we don’t get that. Well other than the fact that we do not have a National Program even now. And that Harper enacted an option to cancel the deal - that was written into the deal and that both sides had.
But seriously, it comes as no surprise that the entrenched interests are fighting against this. I agree with Socialist Greg, a summer election fought on daycare could be fun.
Posted by Greg Staples | March 13, 2006 11:38 AM
Posted on March 13, 2006 11:38
National Daycare program? What planet are you living on? This program is nothing but a fantasy. We don’t have it in our area and never will but I still pay for it.
Posted by primvs pilvs | March 13, 2006 11:38 AM
Posted on March 13, 2006 11:38
We can only hope that the Opposition will be so stupid. I suspect their instinct for survival will kick in and they’ll find a way to back down from their threatened hissy fit.
I wonder if they’ll just keep bringing the government down again and again on this issue when election after election yields the same results.
Or is will this be the year the NDP finally breaks through for that long sought after majority?
Dependency and infantilization for all! And a chicken in every pot!
Posted by Occam's Carbuncle | March 13, 2006 12:14 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 12:14
If Harper is brought down because he does not compromise on daycare, the issue will be his management style. Add this to emerson and shapiro and it could look bad for the boys and girls in blue.
Posted by Greg | March 13, 2006 1:05 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 13:05
Yeah baby! N-D-P! N-D-P!
Majority here we come!
Dependency and infantilization for all!
You know, that has a real ring to it.
I think I’m going to join the party.
No Greg. Prima facie, if the government falls on day care, the election will be on day care, not “management style” or any other flim flam made up issue.
Posted by Occam's Carbuncle | March 13, 2006 1:25 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 13:25
So OC, you don’t think someone might ask why Mr. Harper tried to ram something through, even though he has a minority? If you believe that’s true you may as well believe in an NDP majority. :p
Posted by Greg | March 13, 2006 2:41 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 14:41
“A lot of people fought a long time to get a national daycare program and now that they have one they aren’t about to let a seat warmer PM cut and run from it.”
For every time they pounded more daycares in they pushed more parents away…. National is a lie,, nothing more than a lie!
Try researching it for years like we have, their plan is feminism not the children…
daycare can stay happily but national has to go….
Posted by Sara | March 13, 2006 3:10 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 15:10
Regardless of what happens the Liberal “daycare plan” is dead on arrival. Harper has already issued the cancellation notices to the provinces. Harper can then say to Canadians I want to give you $1,200. per month but the opposition will not support the budget therefore it is dead. Talk to the opposition. Well we will see who is in favour of the Conservative plan then. If the opposition defeats the gov’t over a so called non existent national daycare program it will not matter who the Liberals elect as their leader. It’s a Conservative majority all the way. So go on Graham and Layton you silly men bring on the election over this issue.
Posted by hollinm | March 13, 2006 3:10 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 15:10
Someone might ask, but that won’t make the question the defining issue of any campaign. Only in the fantasies of frustrated socialists who are puzzled by Harper’s inability to see the True Way.
I expect him to push his agenda, just like Martin did with gay marriage. Compromise is not possible in this matter, as the two underpinning philosophies are not compatible in any way shape or form. The socialists want dependency and infantilization in the form of a universal state nanny. Conservatives don’t. Bring on the election. If your side wins, I’ll redouble my efforts to avoid paying taxes.
Posted by Occam's Carbuncle | March 13, 2006 3:10 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 15:10
The Sun spoke to the issue in their editorial today and it all makes sense. However the media need to ask some questions about the Liberal daycare plan. -are provinces required to creates so many day care spaces. -do workers need to be bilingual -if unionized what happens to parents when they decide to go on strike -how much will it cost to send one child to one of these spaces…it ain’t free -will there be equal access for rural and urban parents -prove that your anaylsis shows that a $1 billion a year will create the spaces you said it would -what will be the hours i.e. 9-5, 5 days a week will not assist parents on parttime work. There are other questions that can be asked but I suspect the Liberals will say all these questions need to be answered by the provinces. How then is this a national daycare program. It is a patchwork of agreements where the provinces can use the money how they see fit. The Liberals should be careful what they wish for.
Posted by hollinm | March 13, 2006 3:16 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 15:16
OC. You see, the thing about gay marriage, it got majority support in the house. The conservative tax cut disguised as daycare… probably won’t. I see what the problem is, you are confused by the whole minority/majority thing. That’s okay though, so is Mr. Harper.
Posted by Greg | March 13, 2006 4:04 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 16:04
And the Liberal plan is a massive transfer of wealth from rural and/or single income parents to urban (mostly) dual income parents disguised as a national program.
Posted by Greg Staples | March 13, 2006 4:32 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 16:32
-are provinces required to creates so many day care spaces. No, they can spend this money on housing if they like as long as they call it childcare related…
-do workers need to be bilingual No, they don’t
-if unionized what happens to parents when they decide to go on strike Parents suffer…
-how much will it cost to send one child to one of these spaces… $10,000 per year and going up daily…
it ain’t free -will there be equal access for rural and urban parents No, they won’t fund rural. Ask the territories, they said no to daycare because they wouldn’t give them enough money to do it
-prove that your anaylsis shows that a $1 billion a year will create the spaces you said it would -what will be the hours i.e. 9-5, 5 days a week will not assist parents on parttime work
Millions go to the research group and the so called childcare advocacy groups,, not the children… they yell for raises before the funding of the spaces goes through
Any other questions?
Honestly those answers are true,,,
Posted by Sara | March 13, 2006 5:27 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 17:27
Socialist Greg:
I can count. So you’re saying whatever Harper can get enough votes for he should definitely push through, right? Or does that only count for your cherished “progressive” measures? If he can cobble together the votes for his child care tax rebate, you’re in favour of it right? Because he’d have a majority, and that’s all that counts. I guess we agree after all. Except that only one of us is pretending to know how a vote that hasn’t happened yet will turn out.
Posted by Occam's Carbuncle | March 13, 2006 11:42 PM
Posted on March 13, 2006 23:42
Yes, OC. I think Harper should have pushed his first four priorities and compromised on number 5. Instead he is pushing number 5 and risking one through four.
Posted by Greg | March 14, 2006 6:50 AM
Posted on March 14, 2006 06:50
Oh well. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
Posted by Occam's Carbuncle | March 14, 2006 7:03 AM
Posted on March 14, 2006 07:03
if the childcare issue wasn’t so important then Harper would not of got it… why don’t people understand that. Parents know whats best for their kids, not the government…
Daycare will no disapear, just the daycare lobbyists that make millions off of the deal…
No voter wants to get rid of daycare, but at the same time not every voter needs a daycare on the street corner like a Tim Hortons!
Posted by Sara | March 14, 2006 7:20 AM
Posted on March 14, 2006 07:20