« Choice | Main | Why use a simple explanation »

Well, that

...Hargrove told the crowd at the university that unions "are long overdue for a makeover" in their political activity. Hargrove said CAW members would laugh at their union if it advised them to vote for the NDP and, when the party wins, everything would be fine.

"In the first place, we've learned the hard way that electing the NDP does not solve all our problems," he said, referring to the Ontario NDP's 1990 win.

"We need an active, demanding independent labour movement to push the envelope and hold government accountable — whatever party is in power. Second, our members are far more sophisticated and independent- minded in their politics today. They do not want to be told how to vote."

And the fact that the Federal Accountability Act will no longer allow union leaders to spend members money on political parties, regardless of whether the members agree with the unions preferred party or not.

Comments (2)

Sara:

Can you imagine if the daycare lobbyists called a strike for the workers…

Greg:

Can you imagine if the daycare lobbyists called a strike for the workers…

Yes I can. I can also imagine parents tying their kids in closets so they can go out drinking. What’s your point?

Comments are closed for this post.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 17, 2006 8:48 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Choice.

The next post in this blog is Why use a simple explanation.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.