« A fall fall? | Main | Quebec's have-not status »

It's like there is an impending election or something

Because the polls for Ontario are coming fast and furious. The was the Ipsos-Reid one over the weekend that had the PCs leading 40-37 and now we have two more. The first is from Sun Media/Leger Marketing (h/t NealeNews).

Progressive Conservatives: 37%
Liberals: 35%
New Democrats: 18%
Other: 10%

And one from SES Research.

Liberlas: 43%
Progressive Conservatives: 35%
New Democrats: 17%
Greens: 5%

Two things: my gut tells me that the SES Research numbers are correct - at least if my pulse of the street read is correct. Second, my gut feels a whole lot better knowing that SES Reseach has a knack for getting these things right.

Comments (4)

Greg:

Finally SES numbers. I agree, they are probably on target. It probably means no fall election too.

Greg:

Sorry, my bad, I thought those were national numbers.

Greg:

I need another coffee. ;)

Anonymous:

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm (popup warning!)

Scientists respond to Gore’s warnings of climate catastrophe

“Scientists have an independent obligation to respect and present the truth as they see it,” Al Gore sensibly asserts in his film “An Inconvenient Truth”, showing at Cumberland 4 Cinemas in Toronto since Jun 2. With that outlook in mind, what do world climate experts actually think about the science of his movie?

Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University, in Australia gives what, for many Canadians, is a surprising assessment: “Gore’s circumstantial arguments are so weak that they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that they, and his film, are commanding public attention.”

…paleoclimatologist Professor Tim Patterson testified, “There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth’s temperature over this [geologic] time frame. …

Dr. Boris Winterhalter, former marine researcher at the Geological Survey of Finland and professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, takes apart Gore’s dramatic display of Antarctic glaciers collapsing into the sea. “The breaking glacier wall is a normally occurring phenomenon which is due to the normal advance of a glacier,” …

Dr. Wibjörn Karlén, emeritus professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden, … clarifies that the ‘mass balance’ of Antarctica is positive - more snow is accumulating than melting off. As a result, Ball explains, there is an increase in the ‘calving’ of icebergs as the ice dome of Antarctica is growing and flowing to the oceans.

Gore tells us in the film, “Starting in 1970, there was a precipitous drop-off in the amount and extent and thickness of the Arctic ice cap.” This is misleading, according to Ball: “The survey that Gore cites was a single transect across one part of the Arctic basin in the month of October during the 1960s when we were in the middle of the cooling period. The 1990 runs were done in the warmer month of September, using a wholly different technology.”

… Carter does not pull his punches about Gore’s activism, “The man is an embarrassment to US science and its many fine practitioners, a lot of whom know (but feel unable to state publicly) that his propaganda crusade is mostly based on junk science.”

Comments are closed for this post.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 14, 2006 9:18 AM.

The previous post in this blog was A fall fall?.

The next post in this blog is Quebec's have-not status.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.