How many instances of something is required before it can be called a trend? The 'something' in question here is horrible policy and/or statements in order to pander to Quebec delegates. First it is opening the Consitution to recognize Quebec as a nation (but nudge, nudge, a meaningless definition of nation) and now it is declaring Qana a war crime. Remember that CPC memo that said Michael Ignatieff tends to put his foot in his mouth? What do you call it when the foot-in-mouth disease is strategy?

Comments (5)
I don’t believe it is a strategy. I believe it is poliical inexperience. I will admit that I am concerned as a person who thinks he is our second best option.
Posted by Jason Cherniak | October 11, 2006 7:41 PM
Posted on October 11, 2006 19:41
Why didn’t Israel just make the prisoner swap though?
Posted by Real Conservative | October 11, 2006 9:02 PM
Posted on October 11, 2006 21:02
I’d go one step further and call it “life inexperience”.
He’s a professor, able to say whatever he wants, protected by his “academic freedom”.
Not exactly a bastion of accountability.
And, he’s been there most of his adult life.
Now he’s parachuted into a world where literally every syllable is scrutinized.
I almost feel sorry for him.
Almost.
He’s in for a rough ride. And so are the Libs if he comes out on top.
Posted by Chester | October 11, 2006 10:01 PM
Posted on October 11, 2006 22:01
This should not be chalked up to political inexperience. He is exposing a character flaw by flip-flopping in an attempt to appease the Quebec vote. Political experience wouldn’t help his underlying flaw, it would only allow him to dissimulate better.
Posted by Ben | October 11, 2006 11:31 PM
Posted on October 11, 2006 23:31
The man likes to be all things to all people. Very Liberal of him. :-)
Anyway, he does still have time to firm up his positions…
Posted by Ben (The Tiger in Exile) | October 12, 2006 12:09 AM
Posted on October 12, 2006 00:09