As Paul Wells has kindly pointed out Michael Ignatieff has taken yet another position on Qana. Apparently he meant to say that Qana was a war crime. Not that Israel committed a war crime. Just that war crimes happened. Could have been Hezbollagh, could have been the IDF could have been the two-four, 6-pack, I don't know but look at the shape he's in.
Is there a 5th position out there? Is there yet another different thing he can say to clarify this? Bottom line, I hope he is forced to keep talking about it because now it is laughable.
And another thing if I were as skilled as George Strombolopolous my interviews with Stephane Dion and Martha Hall Findlay would have been as interesting as his with Michael Ignatieff.
« I guess I have to comment | Main | The new template »
4th position
Comments are closed for this post.
Sponsors:
Powered by
Movable Type Personal 4.1
Movable Type Personal 4.1
Site Navigation
Search
(Powered by Google)
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 18, 2006 9:22 AM.
The previous post in this blog was I guess I have to comment.
The next post in this blog is The new template.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (2)
My position on Q’ana is that I have no position on Q’ana. Do I show perfect clear-osity?
Posted by James Bow | October 18, 2006 4:51 PM
Posted on October 18, 2006 16:51
Funny…on Sunday I suggested to his campaign that my first response would have been that I never said who committed the war crime…
Posted by Jason Cherniak | October 18, 2006 6:28 PM
Posted on October 18, 2006 18:28