Update: Oh, but it gets more interesting. Gilles Duceppe is threatening a non-confidence motion over Afghanistan. (h/t Daimnation) Just speculation on my part (that never stopped me before) but this is the type of issue the Conservatives would love to fall on.
Does this mean that Duceppe is getting spooked about the budget next spring wherein the Conservatives have promised to address the fiscal imbalance? Through that the Conservatives can really les bleus and it appears Dion can rally les rouges so things may be getting a bit tight around the collar in BQ headquarters.

Comments (8)
Just curious. What’s the amount sitting in those un-audited, arms-reach, Liberal created foundations? Last time I heard it was around 7.2 out of 9 billion.
Posted by BBS | December 11, 2006 7:42 PM
Posted on December 11, 2006 19:42
Harper to Quebeckers: Vote Conservative! We have enough money to sustain the welfare state in all the economic basket cases under our jurisdiction, both in eastern Canada and in central Asia.
Posted by Anonymous | December 11, 2006 7:54 PM
Posted on December 11, 2006 19:54
I think this move is targeting Dion more than Harper. This type of issue would actually play to Harper’s favour - definitely rally his base and attract a lot of swing voters while leaving the other parties to fight over the remaining political real-estate.
Dion however, is up a certain creek on this one … he was a member of the cabinet that sent them to Kandahar and even on the two year extension vote, the Liberals were very divided. I just saw an interview where Dion tried to explain the cabinet decision as a mission to “transition the Afghanistan conflict from a US-led mission to a NATO mission - now that is complete, so Canada’s responsibilities are finished” … the interviewer was stammering on how to react to this nonsense. Dion was a total joke actually … it was embarrassing.
Posted by yadayada | December 11, 2006 8:28 PM
Posted on December 11, 2006 20:28
Definitely targetting Dion.
Dion’s talking about ‘reviewing’ the Liberals Afghan policy - ie. having it both ways. It looks good to the left wing their trying to court, while not alienating the right.
The seperation of the right leaning libs from the left officially began today.
It will continue with each passing issue.
Culminating, I suspect with tax cuts by the CPC, which Dion will reflexively oppose.
Watch the Lib numbers drop.
Posted by Chester | December 11, 2006 8:56 PM
Posted on December 11, 2006 20:56
Um, can anyone explain then why Jason Cherniak supports Dion? Jason is about as blue a liberal as you will find. When he starts slagging Dion, I might believe your “mass flight” of blue Liberals into the loving embrace of Stephen Harper. theory. Until then, colour me skeptical. Btw, don’t most polls show Canadians hold views closer to Dion’s than Harper’s on Afghanistan? This issue does not seem to be as clear cut as you suggest, other than with confirmed conservatives.
Posted by Greg | December 12, 2006 9:58 AM
Posted on December 12, 2006 09:58
“Btw, don’t most polls show Canadians hold views closer to Dion’s than Harper’s on Afghanistan?”
By the way, aren’t most polls unreliable push polls, conducted and publicized in order to create news for a moribund news industry?
“confirmed conservatives”
There’s nothing particularly “conservative” about foreign military interventions. Just ask Tony Blair, George Bush, Lyndon B. Johnson, John F. Kennedy, Theodore Roosevelt or another non-conservative warmaking leader of your choice. Or, if you prefer, just ask Christopher Hitchens.
Posted by Alan | December 12, 2006 10:41 AM
Posted on December 12, 2006 10:41
Yes the fiscal imbalance will really spook Dueceppe and Boysclair. It will also become more clear with Flaherty’s calculation formula of “net” zero debt by 2020. The utopian status quo pundits hate this calculation because there’s so much disclosure in it.
The “net” calculation will disclose the $120 billion in debt that Quebec has run up in its ill-conceived extreme socialist policies and its submission to corrupt big unions in the Province.
It will also show that Mayor Miller is running a deficit of $200 million and he too is beholding to big unions and developers who are now running Toronto.
The good side of this neat calculation of Flaherty’s will be announcing to the OECD and anybody who’ll listen that Canada looks pretty good on hidden items such as our funded pensions; as compared to Mark Steyn’s demographically imploding Europe. Only Australia and a couple of other countries will look as good, which is a good marketing tool, once we get Quebec straightened out. Harper and Charest will get Quebec to fall into line quickly once the public stops being lied to by the MSM.
PS. We need to do audits on the “foundations” that BBS mentions above, plus the EDC, BDC quasi-banks that fund Quebec under the table. This is great fun, we’re starting to get at the Enron-type financial manoeuvres of the Librano$.
Posted by nomdenet | December 12, 2006 11:18 AM
Posted on December 12, 2006 11:18
Sinister Greg,
When Cherniak declares his loyalty to a party or candidate, his blinders go into overdrive. The day Cherniak flips is the day you wake up and admit global warming is a natural phenomenon. :)
Posted by Dr. Strangelove | December 12, 2006 11:41 AM
Posted on December 12, 2006 11:41