You know the rest. Any why not have Michael Ignatieff as deputy leader of the opposition? Because we all know the best way to compliment a poor performer in the House is to pair him with an even worse performer.
« I am with the speculators | Main | Tied wagons and all that »
You know the rest. Any why not have Michael Ignatieff as deputy leader of the opposition? Because we all know the best way to compliment a poor performer in the House is to pair him with an even worse performer.
(Powered by Google)
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 18, 2006 2:12 PM.
The previous post in this blog was I am with the speculators.
The next post in this blog is Tied wagons and all that.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (5)
You have to admit though, it is a way to keep blue Liberals on side and it also is a gesture to the Quebec wing.
Posted by Greg | December 18, 2006 2:38 PM
Posted on December 18, 2006 14:38
No doubt. It is very smart in that respect. I have just been surprised at how poor Ignatieff does in Question Period.
Posted by Greg Staples | December 18, 2006 2:41 PM
Posted on December 18, 2006 14:41
I wonder how the orange Liberals feel about Iggy being front & center?
Posted by wilson61 | December 18, 2006 5:20 PM
Posted on December 18, 2006 17:20
And now Ignatieff wont have to get up to stab Dion in the back.
Posted by colin | December 18, 2006 6:06 PM
Posted on December 18, 2006 18:06
Greg:
You sure would know…
You have been watching Steve and Pete…and Stock…and Jim (both of them)…and John…and Rona…and Gordon…and Jason…and Bev…and Monte, Vic, Art, Myron and the rest of the gang for months now. Can you say GONGSHOW?
Posted by Devin | December 19, 2006 12:10 AM
Posted on December 19, 2006 00:10