if there is another reason why the NDP does not want anything to do with the Blogging Dippers. What could it be? Hmmm, what could it be?
(h/t Scott Tribe)
« Quid pro quo | Main | The gender gap »
if there is another reason why the NDP does not want anything to do with the Blogging Dippers. What could it be? Hmmm, what could it be?
(h/t Scott Tribe)
(Powered by Google)
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 20, 2006 10:23 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Quid pro quo.
The next post in this blog is The gender gap.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (4)
Well come on, Greg! Who wouldn’t want to have Robert McClelland and Ti-Guy marketing their ideas? You don’t find such virtuous paragons of rational, logical debate too often…
Posted by Chris Taylor | December 20, 2006 11:45 AM
Posted on December 20, 2006 11:45
If they had ditched McLelland out of principle to begin with, then this wouldn’t look so bad for them. Lesson learned?
Posted by Jason Cherniak | December 20, 2006 11:49 AM
Posted on December 20, 2006 11:49
McLelland and many other “Progressive” bloggers would be a delightful addition to the NDP ranks. At least the anti-semitism would be up-front for all to see.
Posted by A.L. | December 20, 2006 6:50 PM
Posted on December 20, 2006 18:50
I don’t know, Greg. What could it be and why don’t you have the guts to come out and say it?
Posted by Robert McClelland | December 21, 2006 12:08 PM
Posted on December 21, 2006 12:08