« And BTW | Main | Now, I don't have a dog in this hunt »

Is the "end of the world"

a per capita measure?

...Jos Olivier, a senior scientist at the government agency who compiled the figures, said: "There will still be some uncertainty about the exact numbers, but this is the best and most up to date estimate available. China relies very heavily on coal and all of the recent trends show their emissions going up very quickly." China's emissions were 2% below those of the US in 2005. Per head of population, China's pollution remains relatively low - about a quarter of that in the US and half that of the UK.

But if you must fall back on the per capita distinction let me point out that China is catching up on that measure as well.

Comments (1)

Not only are they using per cap but also intensity. The problem with China’s emissions (like the US) is the amount of coal - and therefore mercury, particulates, sulphur oxides, radioisotopes. The Rockies are turning grey from coal particles carried in the Pacific jetstream. CO2 is in some ways the least of the problem.

Comments are closed for this post.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 20, 2007 8:40 AM.

The previous post in this blog was And BTW.

The next post in this blog is Now, I don't have a dog in this hunt.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.